4.7 Article

Spray fire induced gas temperature characteristics and correlations in a ceiling ventilated compartment

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 188-199

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.07.041

Keywords

Spray fue; Ceiling ventilated compartment; Heat transfer analysis; Gas temperature correlation

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFE0113400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51276177]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spray fire, one of the common fires, often occurs in ship cabin and results in serious economic loss and casualties. However, there are few literatures [1-3] in terms of compartment spray fire, especially its gas temperature characteristics. Hence, a series of spray fire experiments were conducted in a 2m x 2m x 1.88 m ceiling ventilated compartment. It is found that the injecting pressure and ceiling vent size have significant effect on gas temperature. Gas temperature increases with the increase of injecting pressure and the increase in ceiling vent size results in a higher maximum gas temperature. The gas heat gain dominates the total heat transfer. The percentage of gas heat gain decreases with the ceiling vent size while the heat transfer through ceiling vent and compartment walls increases. For estimating the time-dependent average gas temperature in the combustion process, a simplified model was developed according to the thermal analyses, which shows good agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, based on M-Q-H method, a dimensionless analysis was performed for the total average gas temperature rise during the whole combustion process and the corresponding correlation was established, which can be applicable to estimate the gas temperature in ceiling ventilated compartment spray fire scenario.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available