4.7 Article

Effect of liquid-vapor interface area on the evaporation rate of small sessile droplets

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 300-308

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.05.024

Keywords

Evaporation rate; Sessile droplet; Surface area; Contact angle; Base radius

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [501100001809, 51376130, 50925624]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB720404]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [501100003399, 12JC1405100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is focused on the role of liquid vapor interface area in the evaporation of small sessile droplets. The evaporation processes of small sessile droplets with different geometric parameters are numerically investigated with the quasi-steady diffusion model. The numerical results show that droplets with the same surface area are approximately equal in the evaporation rate despite the great differences in contact angles and base radii. It is attributed to the fact that the gradient distributions of vapor concentration surrounding droplets with the same surface area tend to be consistent as the distance from droplet surface increases. Based on the numerical results, a new simple expression with no fitting parameter is developed to calculate the evaporation rate of sessile droplets, and it is found that the evaporation rate is proportional to the square root of liquid vapor interface area. The proposed expression is in good agreement with the expression of Picknett and Bexon and also validated by the experimental data in open literature. Finally, the evaporation cooling effect of small droplets on an isothermal substrate at room temperature is incorporated into the expression using the average temperature of liquid vapor interface. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available