Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 1-7Publisher
ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2012.10.018
Keywords
Thermoelectric; Thomson effect; Power generation; Model; Analytical; Numerical
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Most thermoelectric device modeling neglects the non-linear Thomson effect in order to develop a closed-form solution to the governing heat equation. This simplified solution is beneficial for system modeling and optimization when more intensive numerical techniques are prohibitive. An averaged Seebeck coefficient is often used in conjunction with the closed-form solution to incorporate approximately the effect of this neglected term (termed the standard model). While the standard model has been accepted in the past for materials under small temperature gradients and relatively constant Seebeck coefficient, there has not been a systematic assessment of validity of this modeling approach, especially for emerging materials and large temperature gradients. This work rigorously demonstrates the accuracy and limitations of the standard model through analytical derivation and comparison with an efficient numerical solution. It is proven that the standard model produces the exact module output power if an integral-averaged Seebeck coefficient is used, and also that the standard model provides a reasonably-accurate estimation of module efficiency, despite its limiting assumptions. These findings prove that the standard model in fact incorporates the Thomson effect with sufficient accuracy that it may be used to simulate and optimize thermoelectric systems as an alternative to computationally expensive numerical simulations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available