4.7 Article

Experimental and analytical investigation of solidification and melting characteristics of PCMs inside cylindrical encapsulation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
Volume 47, Issue 7, Pages 858-874

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2007.07.003

Keywords

phase change; energy storage; solidification; melting; natural convection; energy generation; n-alkanes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phase change materials encapsulated inside cylindrical enclosures are analyzed for solidification and melting process. Analytical solutions for finding the interface locations at various time steps are obtained. Transient interface positions and complete phase change time is predicted by two models for solidification and by three models for melting. To validate the analytical results, experiments are carried out to find the transient positions of the front. The agreement was found to be good for model with conduction and heat generation in solidification process, but in melting the model with conduction, convection and heat generation gives a better prediction. Validated analytical model is extended to study the phase change behavior and heat transfer characteristics inside PCM. Presence of heat generation increases the total solidification time of the cylinder, though it accelerates melting. Total solidification time depends on Stefan number and heat generation parameter beta, whereas complete melting time depends on equivalent thermal conductivity. This paper also analyzes the behavior of three paraffins, 60% n-tetradecane + 40% n-hexadecane, n-tetradecane, and n-pentadecane. Since the model considered the influence of heat generation, analytical predictions are also helpful in applications such as nuclear fuel freezing, microwave thawing, and vacuum freeze drying. (C) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available