4.7 Article

Dynamic design, numerical solution and effective verification of acceleration-level obstacle-avoidance scheme for robot manipulators

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 932-945

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2014.909971

Keywords

redundant robot manipulators; obstacles avoidance; quadratic programming (QP); joint physical constraints; gradient neural network

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61075121, 60935001]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Institutions of Higher Education of China [20100171110045]
  3. Sun Yat-sen University Innovative Talents Cultivation Program for PhD Students

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For avoiding obstacles and joint physical constraints of robot manipulators, this paper proposes and investigates a novel obstacle avoidance scheme (termed the acceleration-level obstacle-avoidance scheme). The scheme is based on a new obstacle-avoidance criterion that is designed by using the gradient neural network approach for the first time. In addition, joint physical constraints such as joint-angle limits, joint-velocity limits and joint-acceleration limits are incorporated into such a scheme, which is further reformulated as a quadratic programming (QP). Two important 'bridge' theorems are established so that such a QP can be converted equivalently to a linear variational inequality and then equivalently to a piecewise-linear projection equation (PLPE). A numerical algorithm based on a PLPE is thus developed and applied for an online solution of the resultant QP. Four path-tracking tasks based on the PA10 robot in the presence of point and window-shaped obstacles demonstrate and verify the effectiveness and accuracy of the acceleration-level obstacle-avoidance scheme. Besides, the comparisons between the non-obstacle-avoidance and obstacle-avoidance results further validate the superiority of the proposed scheme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available