4.5 Article

Significance of genetic variants in DLC1 and their association with hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 4203-4209

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3970

Keywords

deleted in liver cancer 1; single nucleotide polymorphism; hepatocellular carcinoma; mutation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172286, 81372618]
  2. '973' Program [2013CB910803]
  3. National Key Sci-Tech Special Project of China [2012ZX10002-011-005]
  4. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Chronic Liver Disease and Hepatocellular Carcinoma administration at Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen, China)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DLC1 has been shown to be downregulated or absent in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is associated with tumorigenesis and development. However, only a small number of studies have focused on genetic variations of DLC1. The present study performed exon sequencing for the DLC1 gene in HCC tissue samples from 105 patients to identify functional genetic variation of DLC1 and its association with HCC susceptibility, clinicopathological features and prognosis. A novel missense mutation and four non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; rs3816748, rs11203495, rs3816747 and rs532841) were identified. A significant correlation of rs3816747 polymorphisms with HCC susceptibility was identified. Compared to individuals with the GG genotype of rs3816747, those with the GA (odds ratio (OR)=0.486; P=0.037) or GA+AA genotype (OR=0.51; P=0.039) were associated with a significantly decreased HCC risk. Furthermore, patients with the GC+CC genotype of rs3816748, the TC+CC genotype of rs11203495 or the GA+AA genotype of rs3816747 had small-sized tumors compared with those carrying the wild-type genotype. No significant association of DLC1 SNPs with the patients' prognosis was found. These results indicated that genetic variations in the DLC1 gene may confer a risk for HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available