4.4 Article

Rhizobium borbori sp. nov., aniline-degrading bacteria isolated from activated sludge

Publisher

SOC GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.022228-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2007A032400003, 2008B030302043]
  2. fund of Chinese National Programs for High Technology Research and Development [2006AA06Z322]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, China [9351007002000001]
  4. National Major Project on control and rectification of water body pollution [2008ZX07011-007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three aniline-degrading bacteria, strains DN316(T), DN316-1 and DN365, were isolated from activated sludge. According to 16S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic analysis, the isolates belonged to the genus Rhizobium, with Rhizobium (=Agrobacterium) radiobacter LMG 140(T) as the closest relative, with 96.5% sequence similarity. Phylogenetic analysis of the representative strain DN316(T) using sequences of the glnA, thrC and recA genes and the 16S-23S intergenic spacer region confirmed the phylogenetic arrangement obtained from analysis of the 16S rRNA gene. DNA-DNA relatedness between DN316(T) and R. radiobacter LMG 140(T) was 43.7%, clearly indicating that the representative strain DN316(T) represents a novel species. Phenotypic and biochemical characterization of the isolates and insertion sequence-PCR fingerprinting patterns showed several distinctive features that differentiated them from closely related species. The major components of the cellular fatty acids were C(18:1)omega 7c (57.10%), C(16:0) (11.31%) and C(19:0) cyclo omega 8c (10.13%). Based on our taxonomic analysis, the three isolates from activated sludge represent a novel species of the genus Rhizobium, for which the name Rhizobium borbofi sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is DN316(T) (=CICC 10378(T) =LMG 23925(T)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available