4.6 Article

Effects of carotid endarterectomy or stenting on hemodynamic complications in the International Carotid Stenting Study:a randomized comparison

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 284-290

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1111/ijs.12089

Keywords

angioplasty and stenting; carotid endarterectomy; carotid stenosis; hemodynamic complications; stroke prevention

Funding

  1. Dutch Heart Foundation [2005B027, 2010T075]
  2. Reta Lila Weston Trust for Medical Research
  3. Department of Health's National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres
  4. Medical Research Council
  5. Dutch Brain Foundation
  6. Medical Research Council (and managed by NIHR on behalf of the MRCNIHR partnership)
  7. Stroke Association
  8. Sanofi-Synthelabo
  9. European Union
  10. MRC [G0300411] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Medical Research Council [G0300411] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. National Institute for Health Research [PB-PG-0609-19216, NF-SI-0507-10339] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are frequently complicated by hemodynamic instability. Aims The study aims to compare the incidence of hemodynamic complications between carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ISRCTN25337470). Methods Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were randomly allocated to carotid artery stenting or carotid endarterectomy. The occurrence of peri-procedural hemodynamic depression (severe bradycardia, asystole, or hypotension requiring treatment) and hypertension requiring treatment was assessed in a per-protocol analysis. We compared the rate of hemodynamic complications, determined independent predictors thereof, and assessed their relation with the composite outcome of all-cause death, stroke, and myocardial infarction within 30 days of treatment. Results A number of 766 carotid artery stenting and 819 carotid endarterectomy patients had a single completed intervention. Hemodynamic depression occurred in 13.8% after carotid artery stenting and in 7.2% after carotid endarterectomy (relative risk 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4-2.6, P < 0.0001). Hypertension requiring treatment occurred less often after carotid artery stenting than after carotid endarterectomy (relative risk 0.2, 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.4, P < 0.0001). In carotid artery stenting patients, a history of cardiac failure was the strongest independent predictor of hemodynamic depression (relative risk 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.3-4.8, P = 0.009). There was no statistically significant association between hemodynamic complications and the occurrence of the composite outcome. Conclusion Hemodynamic depression occurs more often after carotid artery stenting and severe hypertension more often after carotid endarterectomy, but these complications are not responsible for the excess of major perioperative events after carotid artery stenting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available