4.6 Article

Interleukin-6 as an early predictor for one-year survival following an ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 16-20

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00396.x

Keywords

acute; inflammation; interleukin-6; ischaemic stroke; stroke; survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Early biomarkers for survival in an acute ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack might serve as a useful tool for the clinician. Several studies have highlighted the role of inflammatory biomarkers as an early signal for acute ischaemic stroke prognosis. Aims This study examines the potential advantage of using high-sensitivity interleukin-6 as a possible biomarker at the early stages of acute stroke for identifying patients at a high risk for 12-month mortality. Methods Inflammatory biomarkers and neurological scores were determined in 250 patients following mild to moderate acute ischaemic stroke within 24 h of hospital admission. Outcome data on mortality were collected after 12 months. The signal detection methodology was used to identify subgroups that were at a high risk for 12-month mortality. Results Twelve months following the event, 234 of the 250 stroke patients survived. Signal detection identified predictors that distinguished individuals likely to die from those with a better recovery prediction. Plasma interleukin-6 concentration emerged as the optimal predictor, with a cut point of 6 center dot 47 pg/ml, chi 2 (l, N=250)=20 center dot 5, P < 0 center dot 001. Interleukin-6 above 6 center dot 47 pg/ml during the acute phase predicted subsequent non-survival (P=0 center dot 006, odds ratio 8 center dot 0). Conclusions This study demonstrates the clinical potential of using high-sensitivity interleukin-6 as an early signal for acute ischaemic stroke survival and suggests a clear cut point for patients at a high risk who might benefit from closer clinical surveillance and/or administration of therapeutic interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available