4.5 Review

Understanding Rift Valley fever: Contributions of animal models to disease characterization and control

Journal

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 78-88

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.02.001

Keywords

Rift Valley fever; Pathogenesis; Immune response; Ruminants; Non-human primates

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science grant [AGL2011-22485]
  2. Wellcome Trust fellowship in Public Health and Tropical Medicine [098635/B/12/Z]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science
  4. Wellcome Trust [098635/B/12/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a mosquito-borne viral zoonosis with devastating health impacts in domestic ruminants and humans. Effective vaccines and accurate disease diagnostic tools are key components in the control of RVF. Animal models reproducing infection with RVF virus are of upmost importance in the development of these disease control tools. Rodent infection models are currently used in the initial steps of vaccine development and for the study of virus induced pathology. Translation of data obtained in these animal models to target species (ruminants and humans) is highly desirable but does not always occur. Small ruminants and non-human primates have been used for pathogenesis and transmission studies, and for testing the efficacy of vaccines and therapeutic antiviral compounds. However, the molecular mechanisms of the immune response elicited by RVF virus infection or vaccination are still poorly understood. The paucity of data in this area offers opportunities for new research activities and programs. This review summarizes our current understanding with respect to immunity and pathogenesis of RVF in animal models with a particular emphasis on small ruminants and non-human primates, including recent experimental infection data in sheep. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available