4.4 Article

Critical Evaluation of a Badminton-Specific Endurance Test

Journal

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/IJSPP.2012-0387

Keywords

performance testing; fitness; elite athletes; racket sports; intermittent exercise

Funding

  1. German Badminton Association
  2. Regional Sports Association of the Saarland
  3. Olympic Training Center Rhineland-Palatinate/Saarland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To overcome the limitations of traditional 1-dimensional fitness tests in analyzing physiological properties of badminton players, a badminton-specific endurance test (BST) was created. This study aimed at analyzing the influence of various fitness dimensions on BST performance. Methods: 18 internationally competing male German badminton players (22.4+/-3.2 y, 79.2+/-7.7 kg, 1.84+/-0.06 m, world-ranking position [WRP] 21-501) completed a straight-sprint test, a change-of-direction speed test; various jump tests (countermovement jump, drop jump, standing long jump), a multistage running test (MST), and the BST. During this on-court field test players have to respond to a computerized sign indicating direction and speed of badminton-specific movements by moving into the corresponding corners. Results: Significant correlations were found between performance in MST and BST (individual anaerobic threshold [TAT], r=.63, P=.005; maximum velocity [V-max] r=.60, P=.009). A negative correlation (r=-.59, P =.014) was observed between TAT in BST and drop-jump contact time. No further associations between performance indices could be detected. Apart from a small portion explained by MST results (TAT, R-2=.40; Vmax, R-2=.36), the majority of BST performance cannot be explained by the determined physiological correlates. Moreover, it was impossible to predict the WRP of a player on the basis of BST results (r=.15, P=.55). Conclusions.: Neither discipline-specific performance nor basic physiological properties were appropriately reflected by a BST in elite badminton players. This does not substantiate its validity for regular use as a testing tool. However, it may be useful for monitoring on-court training sessions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available