4.4 Article

Biophysical Characterization of a Swimmer With a Unilateral Arm Amputation: A Case Study

Journal

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0438

Keywords

biomechanics; disability sport; energetics; motor control; swimming

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To examine the effect of swimming speed (nu) on the biomechanical and physiological responses of a trained front-crawl swimmer with a unilateral arm amputation. Methods: A 13-y-old girl with a unilateral arm amputation (level of the elbow) was tested for stroke length (SL, horizontal displacement cover with each stroke cycle), stroke frequency (SF, inverse of the time to complete each stroke cycle), adapted index of coordination (IdC(adapt), lag time between propulsive phases), intracycle velocity variation (IVV, coefficient of variation of the instantaneous velocity-time data), active drag (D, hydrodynamic resistance), and energy cost (C, ratio of metabolic power to speed) during trials of increasing nu. Results: Swimmer data showed a positive relationship between nu and SF (R-2 = 1, P < .001), IVV (R-2 = .98, P = .002), D (R-2 = .98, P < .001), and C (R-2 = .95, P = .001) and a negative relationship with the SL (R-2 = . 99, P = .001). No relation was found between nu and IdC(adapt) (R-2 = .35, P = .22). A quadratic regression best fitted the relationship between nu and general kinematical parameters (SL and SF); a cubic relationship fit the IVV best. The relationship between nu and D was best expressed by a power regression, and the linear regression fit the C and IdC(adapt) best. Conclusions: The subject's adaptation to increased nu was different from able-bodied swimmers, mainly on interarm coordination, maintaining the lag time between propulsive phases, which influence the magnitude of the other parameters. These results might be useful to develop specific training and enhance swimming performance in swimmers with amputations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available