4.4 Article

Effects of Ramadan on the Diurnal Variations of Repeated-Sprint Performance

Journal

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.8.3.254

Keywords

fasting; time of day; RSA; MVC; hematological measurements

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Tunisia
  2. Tunisian Ministry of Scientific Research, Technology, and Development of Competencies, Tunis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This study examined the effects of Ramadan on cycling repeated-sprint ability (RSA) and corresponding diurnal variations. Methods: Twelve active men performed an RSA test (5 x 6-s maximal sprints interspersed with 24 s passive recovery) during morning and afternoon sessions 1 wk before Ramadan (BR), during the second (R2) and the fourth (R4) weeks of Ramadan, and 2 wk after Ramadan (AR). Maximal voluntary contraction was assessed before (MVCpre), immediately after (MVCpost), and 5 min after the RSA test (MVCpost5). Moreover, hematocrit, hemoglobin, and plasma sodium and potassium (K+) concentrations were measured at rest and after the RSA test and MVCpost. Results: Overall, peak power (P-peak) during the RSA test decreased throughout the 5 sprints. P-peak measured in the first sprint and MVCpre were lower during Ramadan than BR in the afternoon (P < .05) and higher in the afternoon than the morning BR and AR (P < .05). However, this diurnal rhythmicity was not found for the last 4 sprints' P-peak, MVCpost and MVCpost5 in all testing periods. Furthermore, the last 4 sprints' P-peak, MVCpost, MVCpost5, and morning MVCpre were not affected by Ramadan. [K+] measured at rest and after the RSA test and MVCpost were higher during Ramadan than BR in the afternoon (P < .05) and higher in the afternoon than the morning during Ramadan (P < .05). Conclusions: Fatigability is higher in the afternoon during Ramadan, and, therefore, training and competition should be scheduled at the time of day when physical performance is less affected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available