4.4 Article

The Effects of Wearing Lower-Body Compression Garments During Endurance Cycling

Journal

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.3.4.424

Keywords

compression garments; physiology; performance; near-infrared spectroscopy; bicycling

Funding

  1. Queensland Academy of Sport Centre of Excellence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The present investigation examined the physiological and performance effects of lower-body compression garments (LBCG) during a one-hour cycling time-trial in well-trained cyclists. Methods: Twelve well-trained male cyclists ([mean +/- SD] age: 20.5 +/- 3.6 years; height: 177.5 +/- 4.9 cm; body mass: 70.5 +/- 7.5 kg; V-O2max; 55.2 +/- 6.8 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) volunteered for the study. Each subject completed two randomly ordered stepwise incremental tests and two randomly ordered one-hour time trials (1HTT) wearing either full-length SportSkins Classic LBCG or underwear briefs (control). Blood lactate concentration (vertical bar BLa-vertical bar), heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (V-O2) and muscle oxygenation (mOxy) were recorded throughout each test. Indicators of cycling endurance performance were anaerobic threshold (AnT) and V-O2max values from the incremental test, and mean power (W), peak power (W), and total work (kJ) from the 1HTT. Magnitude-based inferences were used to determine if LBCG demonstrated any performance and/or physiological benefits. Results: A likely practically significant increase (86%:12%:2%; eta(2) = 0.6) in power output at AnT was observed in the LBCG condition (CONT: 245.9 +/- 55.7 W; LBCG: 259.8 +/- 44.6 W). Further, a possible practically significant improvement (78%:19%:3%; eta(2)= 0.6) was reported in muscle oxygenation economy (W-%mOxy(-1)) across the 1HTT (mOxy: CONT 52.2 +/- 12.2%; LBCG: 57.3 +/- 8.2%). Conclusions: The present results demonstrated limited physiological benefits and no performance enhancement through wearing LBCG during a cycling time trial.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available