4.4 Article

Seasonal Changes in Stress Indicators in High Level Football

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 259-265

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1269894

Keywords

soccer; overreaching; fatigue; performance; match exposure; recovery

Categories

Funding

  1. FIFA (Federation International de Football Associations, Zurich, Switzerland)
  2. International Centre for Sports Studies (CIES, Neuchatel, Switzerland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed at describing changes in stress and performance indicators throughout a competitive season in high level football. 15 players (19.5 +/- 3.0 years, 181 +/- 5 cm, 75.7 +/- 9.0 kg) competing under professional circumstances were tested at baseline and 3 times during the season 2008/09 (in-season 1, 2, 3). Testing consisted of the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes (Total Stress and Recovery score), vertical jump tests (counter movement and drop jump (DJ)), and a maximal ramp-like running test. Average match exposure was higher during a 3-weeks period prior to in-season 3 compared to in-season 1 and 2 (1.5 vs. 1 h/week, p = 0.05). Total Stress score was elevated at in-season 1 and 2 compared to baseline (p < 0.01) with a further increase at in-season 3 (p < 0.03; generalized eta squared (eta(2)(g)) = 0.37). Total Recovery score was decreased at in-season 1 and 3 compared to baseline (p < 0.05; eta(2)(g) = 0.21). Maximal running velocity (V(max)) and jumping heights were not significantly affected (eta(2)(g) = 0.04). Changes in DJ height and V(max) between baseline and in-season 3 were correlated with the corresponding changes in Total Stress score (r = -0.55 and r = -0.61, p < 0.03). Usual match exposure during a professional football season does not induce relevant changes in performance indicators. Accumulated stress and a lack of recovery towards the end of a season might be indicated by psychometric deteriorations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available