4.4 Article

Post-160-km Race Illness Rates and Decreases in Granulocyte Respiratory Burst and Salivary IgA Output are Not Countered by Quercetin Ingestion

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 856-863

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-989424

Keywords

exercise; infections; antibodies; natural killer cells; IgA; respiratory burst

Categories

Funding

  1. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
  2. Army Research Office (ARO) [W911NF-06-0014]
  3. Quercegen Pharma (Newton, MA) [QU995]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This Study measured the influence of the flavonoid quercetin on immune changes and incidence rates of upper respiratory tract infections in ultramarathoners competing in the 160-km Western States Endurance Run. Sixty-three runners were randomized to quercetin and placebo groups, and under double-blinded methods ingested 1000 mg/day quercetin for 3 wks before, during, and 2 wks after the race. Thirty-nine of the 63 subjects (n = 18 for quercetin, n = 21 for placebo) finished the race and provided blood and saliva samples the morning before the race and 15 - 30 min postrace. Upper respiratory tract infections were assessed during the week before and the 2-wk period after the race using an illness symptom checklist. Race times did not differ significantly between quercetin and placebo groups. Significant pre- to postrace decreases were measured for natural killer cells (43%), granulocyte respiratory burst activity (55%), and salivary IgA output (48%), and increases for neutrophil (288%) and monocyte (211%) cell counts, with no significant group differences. Postrace illness rates did not differ between groups. In conclusion, quercetin Supplementation for 3 wks before and 2 wks after the Western States Endurance Run had no effect on illness rates, perturbations in leukocyte subset counts, or decreases in granulocyte respiratory burst activity and salivary IgA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available