4.2 Article

No Improvement in Endurance Performance After a Single Dose of Beetroot Juice

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/ijsnem.22.6.470

Keywords

nitrate; time trial; cycling; ergogenic aids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Dietary nitrate supplementation has received much attention in the literature due to its proposed ergogenic properties. Recently, the ingestion of a single bolus of nitrate-rich beetroot juice (500 ml, similar to 6.2 mmol NO3-) was reported to improve subsequent time-trial performance. However, this large volume of ingested beetroot juice does not represent a realistic dietary strategy for athletes to follow in a practical, performance-based setting. Therefore, we investigated the impact of ingesting a single bolus of concentrated nitrate-rich beetroot juice (140 ml, similar to 8.7 mmol NO3-) on subsequent 1-hr time-trial performance in well-trained cyclists. Methods: Using a double-blind, repeated-measures crossover design (1-wk washout period), 20 trained male cyclists (26 +/- 1 yr, VO2peak 60 +/- 1 ml . kg(-1) . min(-1), W-max 398 +/- 7.7 W) ingested 140 ml of concentrated beetroot juice (8.7 mmol NO3-; BEET) or a placebo (nitrate-depleted beetroot juice; PLAC) with breakfast 2.5 hr before an similar to 1-hr cycling time trial (1,073 +/- 21 kJ). Resting blood samples were collected every 30 min after BEET or PLAC ingestion and immediately after the time trial. Results: Plasma nitrite concentration was higher in BEET than PLAC before the onset of the time trial (532 +/- 32 vs. 271 +/- 13 nM, respectively; p < .001), but subsequent time-trial performance (65.5 +/- 1.1 vs. 65 +/- 1.1 s), power output (275 +/- 7 vs. 278 +/- 7 W), and heart rate (170 +/- 2 vs. 170 +/- 2 beats/min) did not differ between BEET and PLAC treatments (all p > .05). Conclusion: Ingestion of a single bolus of concentrated (140 ml) beetroot juice (8.7 mmol NO3-) does not improve subsequent 1-hr time-trial performance in well-trained cyclists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available