4.6 Article

The effects of the interphase and strain gradients on the elasticity of layer by layer (LBL) polymer/clay nanocomposites

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 1044-1053

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.12.008

Keywords

Polymer/clay; Nanocomposites; Interphase; Strain gradient; Finite element; Mori-Tanaka model; Size effect

Categories

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-06-1-0473]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A synergistic stiffening effect observed in the elastic mechanical properties of LBL assembled polymer/clay nanocomposites is studied via two continuum mechanics approaches. The nanostructure of the representative volume element (RVE) includes an effective interphase layer that is assumed to be perfectly bonded to the particle and matrix phases. An inverse method to determine the effective thickness and stiffness of the interphase layer using finite element (FE) simulations and experimental data previously published in Kaushik et al. (2009), is first illustrated. Next, a size-dependent strain gradient Mori-Tanaka (M-T) model (SGMT) is developed by applying strain gradient elasticity to the classical M-T method. Both approaches are applied to LBL-assembled polyurethane-montmorillonite (PU-MTM) clay nanocomposites. Both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) FE models used in the first approach are shown to be able to accurately predict the stiffness of the PU-MTM specimens with various volume fractions. The SGMT model also accurately predicts the experimentally observed increase in stiffness of the PU-MTM nanocomposite with increasing volume fraction of clay. An analogy between the strain gradient effect and the role of an interphase in accounting for the synergistic elastic stiffening in nanocomposites is provided. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available