4.6 Article

Modeling of mixed-mode debonding in the peel test applied to superficial reinforcements

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 45, Issue 20, Pages 5419-5436

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.05.024

Keywords

cohesive zone modeling; contact mechanics; fiber reinforced polymers; finite element method; interface debonding; mixed-mode fracture; peel test

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on modeling of the interface between a rigid substrate and a thin elastic adherend subjected to mixed-mode loading in the peel test configuration. The context in which the investigation is situated is the study of bond between fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) sheets and quasi-brittle substrates, where FRP sheets are used as a strengthening system for existing structures. The problem is approached both analytically and numerically. The analytical model is based on the linear-elastic fracture mechanics energy approach. In the numerical model, the interface is discretized with zero-thickness contact elements which account for both debonding and contact within a unified framework, using the node-to-segment contact strategy. Uncoupled cohesive interface constitutive laws are adopted in the normal and tangential directions. The formulation is implemented and tested using the finite element code FEAR The models are able to predict the response of the bonded joint as a function of the main parameters, which are identified through dimensional analysis. The main objective is to compute the debonding load and the effective bond length of the adherend, i.e., the value of bond length beyond which a further increase has no effect on the debonding load. as functions of the peel angle. The detailed distributions of interfacial shear and normal stresses are also found. Numerical results and analytical predictions are shown to be in excellent agreement. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available