4.7 Article

Seismic travel-time and attenuation tomography to characterize the excavation damaged zone and the surrounding rock mass of a newly excavated ramp and chamber

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.06.010

Keywords

Mining; Time-lapse tomography; Excavation damaged zone; Underground lab; Attenuation

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [03G0738A, 03G0752A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seismic travel-time and attenuation tomography were applied to characterize the excavation damaged zone and the adjacent rock mass in the GFZ-Underground-Lab within the research and education mine Reiche Zeche of the Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg (Germany). The lab is situated in gneiss rocks at 150 m depth and comprises three galleries which enclose an area of approximately 50 m x 100 m. Along these galleries two seismic surveys were performed before and after the excavation of a new ramp and chamber. For both measurements, travel-time and attenuation tomographies for P-waves were performed with the ray-based inversion algorithm SIMULPS14. The seismic velocities were calculated from first-arrival travel Limes whereas a logarithmic-spectral-ratio approach was used to calculate the corresponding quality factors (Q) for attenuation tomography. A comparison of the tomograms reveals a decrease of average P-wave velocity values from 5.64 km/s to 5.54 km/s and of average Q-values from 29.8 to 26.5 in the whole area after the excavation of the new cavities. The maximum changes are located at already weakened zones either at the conjunction of two galleries or of a major fracture zone with a gallery. The attenuation tomography shows a higher sensitivity to rock mass changes than the travel-time tomography. However, the calculation of the Q-values demands a higher signal quality than the determination of the seismic travel times. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available