4.7 Article

Modification of a generalized three-dimensional Hoek-Brown strength criterion

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.12.009

Keywords

Hoek-Brown strength criterion; 3D strength criterion; Failure surface; Lode dependence; Smoothness; Convexity

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. State Key Laboratory for GeoMechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining Technology [SKLGDUEK1011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To take account of the influence of the intermediate principle stress, Zhang and Zhu [1,2] proposed a three-dimensional (3D) version of the generalized Hoek-Brown strength criterion. The generalized Zhang-Zhu strength criterion is a true 3D version of the Hoek-Brown criterion, not only inheriting the advantages of the Hoek-Brown strength criterion, but predicts the same strength as the two-dimensional (2D) Hoek-Brown strength criterion at both triaxial compression and extension states. However, the failure surface of the generalized 3D Zhang-Zhu strength criterion is not smooth at either the triaxial compression or extension state and concave at the triaxial extension state, which may have problems with some stress paths and cause inconvenience for numerical applications. In this paper, the reason for the non-smoothness and non-convexity of the generalized 3D Zhang-Zhu strength criterion was first discussed by studying its Lode dependence. Then the criterion was modified by utilizing three different Lode dependences with characteristics of both smoothness and convexity to replace its Lode dependence. Finally the smoothness, convexity and prediction accuracy of the modified criteria were evaluated by applying them to analyze both intact rocks and jointed rock masses. The modified criteria not only keep the advantages of the generalized 3D Zhang-Zhu strength criterion, but solve the non-smoothness and non-convexity problem with no loss of accuracy for strength prediction. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available