4.7 Article

Failure criteria for rocks based on smooth approximations to Mohr-Coulomb and Hoek-Brown failure functions

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.07.032

Keywords

Rock strength; Failure criteria; Intermediate principal stress; Mohr-Coulomb criterion; Hoek-Brown criterion; Anisotropy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Existing experimental evidence from true triaxial test (also referred to as poly-axial test) indicates that the influence of the intermediate principal stress (sigma(2)) on rock strength is substantial. In order to consider this effect in rock engineering design, an adequate 3D failurecriterion, which takes into account the effect of sigma(2), is required. Such a criterion should not only be a convex but also a smoothfunction of stress state; the latter to avoid singularities and to ensure the numerical stability. The most popular failurecriteria used in rock mechanics, i.e., MohrCoulomb (MC) and HoekBrown (HB), both ignore the effect of sigma(2) and also have singular corners. Hence, in this paper, the MC and HB criteria are modified to their 3D versions based on geometric approximations of deviatoric sections that lead to smooth and convex surfaces for a wide range of strength parameters. The derived criteria inherit all the key properties of the original ones and are formulated in terms of stress invariants introduced by Nayak and Zienkiewicz. The latter provides an easy way to identify the strength parameters from non-linear multiple regression analysis using the poly-axial test data. In order to validate the proposed criteria, eight sets of poly-axial tests selected from literature are fitted. The results clearly show that the new criteria are quite accurate for all rock types considered. Finally, an extension of the proposed criteria to account for anisotropic rock conditions is discussed and an illustrative example is provided incorporating the functional forms of HB and modified HB criteria. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available