4.7 Article

Influence of intermediate principal stress on rock fracturing and strength near excavation boundaries - Insight from numerical modeling

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.07.026

Keywords

intermediate principal stress; rock fracturing; rock strength; tunnel; numerical model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of the intermediate principal stress on rock fracturing and strength near excavation boundaries is studied using a FEM/DEM combined numerical tool. A loading condition of sigma(3) = 0 and sigma(1) not equal 0, and sigma(2) not equal 0 exists at the tunnel boundary, where sigma(1), sigma(2), and sigma(3), are the maximum, intermediate, and minimum principal stress components, respectively. The numerical study is based on sample loading testing that follows this type of boundary stress condition. It is seen from the simulation results that the generation of tunnel surface parallel fractures and microcracks is attributed to material heterogeneity and the existence of relatively high intermediate principal stress (sigma(2)), as well as zero to low minimum principal stress (sigma(3)) confinement. A high intermediate principal stress confines the rock in such a way that microcracks and fractures can only be developed in the direction parallel to sigma(1) and sigma(2). Stress-induced fracturing and microcracking in this fashion can lead to onion-skin fractures, spalling, and slabbing in shallow ground near the opening and surface parallel microcracks further away from the opening, leading to anisotropic behavior of the rock. Hence, consideration of the effect of the intermediate principal stress on rock behavior should focus on the stress-induced anisotropic strength and deformation behavior of the rocks. It is also found that the intermediate principal stress has limited influence on the peak strength of the rock near the excavation boundary. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available