4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Guiding the Search for Native-like Protein Conformations with an Ab-initio Tree-based Exploration

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 1106-1127

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0278364910371527

Keywords

native-like protein conformations; tree-based search; guided exploration; discretization layers; projection space; energy landscape; robotics-inspired; probabilistic sampling

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we propose a robotics-inspired method to enhance sampling of native-like conformations when employing only aminoacid sequence information for a protein at hand. Computing such conformations, essential to associating structural and functional information with gene sequences, is challenging due to the high-dimensionality and the rugged energy surface of the protein conformational space. The contribution of this paper is a novel two-layered method to enhance the sampling of geometrically distinct low-energy conformations at a coarse-grained level of detail. The method grows a tree in conformational space reconciling two goals: (i) guiding the tree towards lower energies; and (ii) not oversampling geometrically similar conformations. Discretizations of the energy surface and a low-dimensional projection space are employed to select more often for expansion low-energy conformations in under-explored regions of the conformational space. The tree is expanded with low-energy conformations through a Metropolis Monte Carlo framework that uses a move set of physical fragment configurations. Testing on sequences of eight small-to-medium structurally diverse proteins shows that the method rapidly samples native-like conformations in a few hours on a single CPU. Analysis shows that computed conformations are good candidates for further detailed energetic refinements by larger studies in protein engineering and design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available