Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
Volume 32, Issue 20, Pages 5875-5889Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2010.507792
Keywords
-
Funding
- European Spatial Agency [20801/07/I-LG]
- Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [AYA2008-0595-C04-01]
- European Union [FP7-ENV-2007-1, 212921, 036946]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Chlorophyll fluorescence (ChF) is a relevant indicator of the actual plant physiological status. In this article different methods to measure ChF from remote sensing are evaluated: the Fraunhofer Line Discrimination (FLD), the Fluorescence Radiative Method (FRM) and the improved Fraunhofer Line Discrimination (iFLD). The three methods have been applied to data acquired in the framework of the CarboEurope, FLEX and Sentinel-2 (CEFLES2) campaign in Les Landes, France in September 2007. Comparing with in situ measurements, the results indicate that the methods that provide the best results are the FLD and the iFLD with root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.4 and 0.5 mW m(-2) sr(-1) nm(-1), respectively, while the FRM provides an error of 0.8 mW m(-2) sr(-1) nm(-1).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available