4.6 Article

Application of multitemporal Landsat data to monitor land cover changes in the Eastern Nile Delta region, Egypt

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
Volume 30, Issue 11, Pages 2977-2996

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431160802558675

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ford Foundation and the Graduate School
  2. Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the progressive increase in development of desert land in Egypt, the demand for efficient and accurate land cover change information is increasing. In this study, we apply the methodology of post-classification change detection to map and monitor land cover change patterns related to agricultural development and urban expansion in the desert fringes of the Eastern Nile Delta region. Using a hybrid classification approach, we employ multitemporal Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM)/Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) images from 1984, 1990 and 2003 to produce three land cover/land-use maps. Post-classification comparison of these maps was used to obtain 'from-to' statistics and change detection maps. The change detection results show that agricultural development increased by 14% through the study period. The average annual rate of land reclamation during 1990-2003 (4511haa-1) was comparable to that during 1984-1990 (4644haa-1), reflecting a systematic national plan for desert reclamation that went into effect. We find that the increase in urbanization (by ca 21300ha) during 1990-2003 was predominantly due to encroachment into traditionally cultivated land at the fringes of urban centres. Our results accurately quantify the land cover changes and delineate their spatial patterns, demonstrating the utility of Landsat data in analysing landscape dynamics over time. Such information is critical for making efficient and sustainable policies for resource management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available