4.8 Article

HLTF's Ancient HIRAN Domain Binds 3′ DNA Ends to Drive Replication Fork Reversal

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 1090-1100

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH grant [R01 ES016486]
  2. Vanderbilt Center in Molecular Toxicology [P30 ES000267]
  3. American Cancer Society fellowship [PF-12-156-01-DMC]
  4. NIH training grant in Tumor Biology [T32 CA09151]
  5. Vanderbilt Molecular Biophysics Training Program [NIH T32 GM08320]
  6. Regenerative Medicine Research Fund [13-SCA-UCHC-03]
  7. Connecticut Department of Public Health Biomedical Research Fund [2013-0203]
  8. University of Connecticut Summer Undergraduate Research Fund (SURF)
  9. US DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  10. Michigan Economic Development Corporation
  11. Michigan Technology Tri-Corridor [085P1000817]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stalled replication forks are a critical problem for the cell because they can lead to complex genome rear-rangements that underlie cell death and disease. Processes such as DNA damage tolerance and replication fork reversal protect stalled forks from these events. A central mediator of these DNA damage responses in humans is the Rad5-related DNA translocase, HLTF. Here, we present biochemical and structural evidence that the HIRAN domain, an ancient and conserved domain found in HLTF and other DNA processing proteins, is a modified oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide (OB) fold that binds to 3' ssDNA ends. We demonstrate that the HIRAN domain promotes HLTF-dependent fork reversal in vitro through its interaction with 3' ssDNA ends found at forks. Finally, we show that HLTF restrains replication fork progression in cells in a HIRAN-dependent manner. These findings establish a mechanism of HLTF-mediated fork reversal and provide insight into the requirement for distinct fork remodeling activities in the cell.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available