4.7 Article

CONFIRMATION OF A LOW alpha/beta RATIO FOR PROSTATE CANCER TREATED BY EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY ALONE USING A POST-TREATMENT REPEATED-MEASURES MODEL FOR PSA DYNAMICS

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.008

Keywords

Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; Progression of disease; Radiation therapy; alpha/beta; Radiosensitivity

Funding

  1. US National Cancer Institute [CA110518]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P50CA069568, R21CA110518, R33CA110518] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To estimate the alpha/beta ratio of prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation only by use of a model of long-term prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dynamics. Methods and Materials: Repeated measures of PSA from 5,093 patients from 6 institutions treated for localized prostate cancer by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) without planned androgen deprivation were analyzed. A biphasic linear mixed model described the post-treatment evolution of PSA, rather than a conventional model of time to biochemical recurrence. The model was adjusted for standard prognostic factors (T stage, initial PSA level, and Gleason score) and cohort-specific effects. The radiation dose fractionation effect was estimated from the long-term rate of rise of PSA level. Results: Adjusted for other factors, total dose of EBRT and sum of squared doses per fraction were associated with long-term rate of change of PSA level (p = 0.0017 and p = 0.0003, respectively), an increase of each being associated with a lower rate of rise. The alpha/beta ratio was estimated at 1.55 Gy (95% confidence band, 0.46-4.52 Gy). This estimate was robust to adjustment of the linear mixed model. Conclusions: By analysis of a large EBRT-only cohort along with a method that uses all the repeated measures of PSA after the end of treatment, a low and precise alpha/beta was estimated. These data support the use of hypofractionation at fractional doses up to 2.8 Gy but cannot presently be assumed to accurately represent higher doses per fraction. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available