4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

USING F-18-FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY TO ESTIMATE THE LENGTH OF GROSS TUMOR IN PATIENTS WITH SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.015

Keywords

Esophageal carcinoma; Positron emission tomography; Radiotherapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To determine the optimal method of using F-18-fiuorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to estimate gross tumor length in esophageal carcinoma. Methods and Materials: Thirty-six patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radical surgery were enrolled. Gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were delineated using three different methods: visual interpretation, standardized uptake value (SUV) 2.5, and 40% of maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET imaging. The length of tumors on PET scan were measured and recorded as Length(vis), Length2.5, and Length(40), respectively, and compared with the length of gross tumor in the resected specimen (Length(gross)). All PET data were reviewed again postoperatively, and the GTV was delineated using various percentages of SUVmax. The optimal-threshold SUV was generated when the length of PET matched the Length(gross). Results: The mean (+/- SD) Length(gross), was 5.48 +/- 1.98 cm. The mean Lengthvis, Length2.5, and Length(40) were 5.18 +/- 1.93 cm, 5.49 +/- 1.79 cm, and 4.34 +/- 1.54 cm, respectively. The mean Length(vis) (p = (0.123) and Length(2.5) (p = 0.957) were not significantly different from Length(gross), and Length2.5 seems more approximate to Length(gross). The mean Length(40) was significantly shorter than Length(gross) (p < 0.001). The mean optimal threshold was 23.81% +/- 11.29% for all tumors, and it was 19.78% +/- 8.59%, 30.92% +/- 12.28% for tumors >= 5 cm, and <5 cm, respectively (p = 0.009). The correlation coefficients of the optimal threshold were -0.802 and -0.561 with SUV,a, and Length(gross), respectively. Conclusions: The optimal PET method to estimate the length of gross tumor varies with tumor length and SUVmax; an SUV cutoff of 2.5 provided the closest estimation in this study. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available