4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

ANORECTAL FUNCTION AFTER THREE- VERSUS TWO-DIMENSIONAL RADIATION THERAPY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.058

Keywords

Radiotherapy; Prostate cancer; Anorectal function; Manometry; 3D CRT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To compare the effects of (three-dimensional) 3D vs. two-dimensional (2D) radiation therapy (RT) for carcinoma of the prostate on the prevalence and pathophysiology of anorectal dysfunction. Methods and Materials: Anorectal symptoms, motility, sensory function, and anal sphincter morphology were evaluated before and up to 2 years after randomly assigned hypofractionated vs. conventionally fractionated RT in 67 patients (median age, 69 years; range, 54-82 years) with localized prostate carcinoma, using either a 3D (n = 29) or 2D (n = 38) treatment technique. Results: Anorectal symptoms increased 4 to 6 weeks after RT and persisted in both patient groups. At 2 years, abnormalities included increased stool frequency (55% vs. 53%,p = NS), urgency of defecation (72% vs. 47%, p < 0.05), fecal incontinence (28% vs. 26%,p = NS), and rectal bleeding (38% and 42%,p = NS). Anorectal motility and sensory function deteriorated after RT in both groups with reductions in basal anal pressures, anal pressures in response to squeeze, rectal compliance, and rectal volumes associated with the desire to defecate. External but not internal sphincter thickness changed in the treatment groups although in different directions. However no differences in motility or sensory function were detected between the groups. Baseline anorectal motility but not treatment technique and the hypofracionated schedule were of independent prognostic significance for anorectal motor dysfunction and rectal bleeding respectively at 2 years. Conclusion: The prevalence and pathophysiology of anorectal dysfunction 2 years after RT for prostate carcinoma was largely independent of the treatment techniques used in this study. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available