4.5 Article

Heterogeneity of tumour response to combined radiotherapy and EGFR inhibitors: Differences between antibodies and TK inhibitors

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 11, Pages 943-954

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09553000903232835

Keywords

EGFR inhibition; radiotherapy; chemotherapy; monoclonal antibody; tyrosine kinase inhibitor; biomarker

Funding

  1. German Research Council [BA 1433/6-1]
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Science [03ZIK041, 03ZIK042, 03NUK006B]
  3. [DFG-PAK 190]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Clinical and preclinical data show a wide variability of tumour response to combined inhibition of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Differences are obvious not only between different tumour entities, but also between different combination schedules and different classes of drugs. The underlying reasons are currently not well understood. Conclusions: In light of the disappointing results of some phase III trials on combined EGFR tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibition and chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer, but also of some early clinical trials on the triple combination of EGFR inhibitors and radio-chemotherapy, negative interactions between the components of the treatment cannot be ruled out. Also, there is increasing evidence for a differential activity of anti-EGFR antibodies and EGFR-TK inhibitors. Potential reasons are an immunogenic component of the cytotoxic effect of chimeric antibodies, alternative signal transduction pathways leading to acquired resistance against the drugs, different effects on tumour micromilieu or nutritional supply, differences in pharmacokinetics and intratumoural distribution or different effects on cancer stem cells. Clarifying these potential mechanisms will require further preclinical and clinical research effort but could in future enable us to individually tailor the use of molecular targeted drugs in order to fully utilise their high potential in cancer therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available