4.4 Article

Uncertainty Quantification in Thermochemistry, Benchmarking Electronic Structure Computations, and Active Thermochemical Tables

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY
Volume 114, Issue 17, Pages 1097-1101

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qua.24605

Keywords

enthalpies of formation; accuracy; mean absolute deviation; benchmark sets; experiment-theory interface

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accepted convention for expressing uncertainties of thermochemical quantities, followed by virtually all thermochemical tabulations, is to provide earnest estimates of 95% confidence intervals. Theoretical studies frequently ignore this convention, and, instead, provide the mean absolute deviation, which underestimates the recommended thermochemical uncertainty by a factor of 2.5-3.5 or even more, and thus may vitiate claims that chemical accuracy (ability to predict thermochemical quantities within +/-1 kcal/mol) has been achieved. Furthermore, copropagating underestimated uncertainties for theoretical values with uncertainties found in thermochemical compilations produces invalid uncertainties for reaction enthalpies. Two groups of procedures for determining the accuracy of computed thermochemical quantities are outlined: one relying on estimates that are based on experience, the other on benchmarking. Benchmarking procedures require a source of thermochemical data that is as accurate and reliable as possible. The role of Active Thermochemical Tables in benchmarking state-of-the-art electronic structure methods is discussed. Published 2014. This article is a U. S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available