4.6 Article

Self-rated health in different social classes of Slovenian adult population: nationwide cross-sectional study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 45-54

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-0103-1

Keywords

Cross-sectional study; Self-rated health; Social class; Social environment; Slovenia

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Sport
  2. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia [L3-3128-0381]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Self-rated health can be influenced by several characteristics of the social environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between self-rated health and self-assessed social class in Slovenian adult population. The study was based on the Countrywide Integrated Non-communicable Diseases Intervention Health Monitor database. During 2004, 8,741/15,297 (57.1%) participants aged 25-64 years returned posted self-administered questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to determine unadjusted and adjusted estimates of association between poor self-rated health and self-assessed social class. Poor self-rated health was reported by 9.6% of participants with a decrease from lower to upper-middle/upper self-assessed social class (35.9 vs. 3.7%). Logistic regression showed significant association between self-rated health and all self-assessed social classes. In an adjusted model, poor self-rated health remained associated with self-assessed social class (odds ratio for lower vs. upper-middle/upper self-assessed social class 4.23, 95% confidence interval 2.46-7.25; P < 0.001). Our study confirmed differences in the prevalence of poor self-rated health across self-assessed social classes. Participants from lower self-assessed social class reported poor self-rated health most often and should comprise the focus of multisectoral interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available