4.4 Article

The subjective pupil old/new effect: Is the truth plain to see?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages 48-56

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.05.001

Keywords

Recognition memory; False memory; Pupil size; Pupillometry; Embodied language; Old/new effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human memory is an imperfect process, prone to distortion and errors that range from minor disturbances to major errors that can have serious consequences on everyday life. In this study, we investigated false remembering of manipulatory verbs using an explicit recognition task and pupillometry. Our results replicated the classical pupil old/new effect as well as data in false remembering literature that show how items must be recognize as old in order for the pupil size to increase (e.g., subjective pupil old/new effect), even though these items do not necessarily have to be truly old. These findings support the strength-of-memory trace account that affirms that pupil dilation is related to experience rather than to the accuracy of recognition. Moreover, behavioral results showed higher rates of true and false recognitions for manipulatory verbs and a consequent larger pupil diameter, supporting the embodied view of language. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available