4.4 Article

Association between interoception and empathy: Evidence from heartbeat-evoked brain potential

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages 259-265

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.015

Keywords

Interoception; Empathy; Heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP); Electrocardiography (ECG); Social neuroscience

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23830107, 21330168] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physiological bodily states play an important role in affective experiences. This study investigated whether the neural processing of internal body state (interoception) is associated with empathy, the understanding of the affective states of others. We used the 'heartbeat-evoked potential' (HEP), a surface electroencephalography (EEG) pattern, as a neural index of interoceptive processing. The HEP is contingent on the most prominent peak (R-wave) of the electrocardiogram (ECG) and is thought to reflect cortical processing of cardiac afferent input. Twenty-one healthy adults performed empathy and control tasks while EEG and ECG were recorded, where they made judgments based on either the affective or physical aspects of images of human eyes. HEP. ECG and heart rate in each task block were calculated and compared. Results showed that cardiac activity was not significantly different between tasks. In contrast, HEP showed a significant task difference, exhibited as an increased negativity during the empathy task over frontocentral sites at a latency of approximately 250-430 ms. Furthermore, a self-reported measure of empathy was associated with mean HEP amplitude during the period of task-related differentiation. These results suggest that afferent feedback from visceral activity may contribute to inferences about the affective state of others. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available