4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Unmixing concurrent EEG-fMRI with parallel independent component analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages 222-234

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.04.010

Keywords

EEG-fMRI; ICA; ERP; auditory; change detection

Funding

  1. MRC [G0701038] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0701038] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0701038] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIBIB NIH HHS [1 R01 EB 005846, R01 EB005846-01, R01 EB006841, R01 EB000840, R01 EB005846, 1 R01 EB 000840, R01 EB020407] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Concurrent event-related EEG-fMRI recordings pick up volume-conducted and hemodynamically convoluted signals from latent neural sources that are spatially and temporally mixed across the brain, i.e. the observed data in both modalities represent multiple, simultaneously active, regionally overlapping neuronal mass responses. This mixing process decreases the sensitivity of voxel-by-voxel prediction of hemodynamic activation by the EEG when multiple sources contribute to either the predictor and/or the response variables. In order to address this problem, we used independent component analysis (ICA) to recover maps from the fMRI and timecourses from the EEG, and matched these components across the modalities by correlating their trial-to-trial modulation. The analysis was implemented as a group-level ICA that extracts a single set of components from the data and directly allows for population inferences about consistently expressed function-relevant spatiotemporal responses. We illustrate the utility of this method by extracting a previously undetected but relevant EEG-fMRI component from a concurrent auditory target detection experiment. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available