4.7 Article

Weaving a semantic grid for multidisciplinary collaborative design

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 3079-3095

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207540701769966

Keywords

collaborative design; ontology; Semantic Web; Semantic Grid; service-oriented modelling; workflow

Funding

  1. National High-Tech R&D program, China [2006AA01Z170, 2007AA01Z124]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation, China [60703042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes a preliminary attempt at weaving a Semantic Grid for multidisciplinary collaborative design over the internet. An ontology-based service-oriented modelling approach is proposed for distributed management of multidisciplinary design knowledge, through which, various Grid services for distributed applications are annotated with domain resource ontology to facilitate their autonomous deployment, reuse and federation in multidisciplinary collaborative design in a meaningful and flexible way. A service-oriented multi-agent system architecture is laid out in the peer-to-peer network of a distributed, scalable, semantic service registry to address, in an open, decentralised and loosely coupled manner, the life cycle of multidisciplinary collaborative design activities involved in publishing, discovering and reusing various Grid services efficiently. An intelligent service-oriented workflow planner equipped with an ontology- and rule-based problem-solving strategy is devised to support the users in constructing the workflow of a complex engineering design process from existing multidisciplinary design resources automatically, utilising their semantic descriptions. An example in applying the proposed approach to a multidisciplinary collaborative design of metal stamping progressive die is presented to illustrate the potential application of the workflow planner in the Semantic Grid.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available