4.6 Article

Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material, energy and waste flows

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS
Volume 140, Issue 1, Pages 227-238

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.036

Keywords

Process mapping; Sustainable manufacture; Zero carbon; Material energy and waste modelling

Funding

  1. EPSRC [TS/H001565/1, EP/I033351/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I033351/1, TS/H001565/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sustainable society cannot be realised without more efficient approaches and technologies, which must in part be provided by manufacturing. Available literature covers the principles for making manufacturing more sustainable, but there is little, if any, practical guidance to show how to apply these principles. Lower level guidelines are required to provide guidance on systematically analysing manufacturing facilities and to assist with the identification and selection of improvement opportunities. This paper reports on work to develop guidelines for Material. Energy and Waste (MEW) process flow modelling to support the pursuit of sustainable manufacturing. Using qualitative MEW process flow maps of a case facility, data was collected to build a spreadsheet model aligned to each of the MEW process flows. The quantitative analysis provided detailed insight into the MEW process flows within the system and assisted with the identification and selection of environmental efficiency improvements. The key learning points from conducting the analysis generated a set of guidelines to aid the analysis of manufacturing systems, using MEW process flow modelling. This paper documents the approach developed and the environmental performance improvement opportunities identified in the case facility. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available