4.5 Article

Creep crack growth data and prediction for a P91 weld at 650 °C

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.09.002

Keywords

Creep crack growth; Compact tension testing; P91; Finite element; Damage analysis

Funding

  1. EPSRC [GR/S86334/01, EP/F029748]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S86334/01, EP/F029748/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/F029748/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Creep crack growth tests have been carried out on compact tension (CT) specimens machined from a P91 weldment. Four of these specimens were cut from the parent material side of the weld and another seven specimens were cut across the weld. For the cross-weld specimens, starter cracks were positioned into (or close to) the Type IV region. The creep tests were carried out under constant loads, at 650 degrees C. The results obtained showed that, the creep crack growth rates for parent material specimens are about ten times lower than those for the cross-weld specimens and that the scatter in the data is relatively high. In this respect, the accuracy of the crack tip location, in the cross-weld CT specimens, plays an important role. Finite Element (FE) analyses were carried out, on notched bar and CT models, using damage mechanics material behaviour models. These analyses were used to estimate the triaxial stress factor, a, for the parent material (PM), the weld metal (WM) and the heat affected zone (HAZ). FE analyses were then used to predict the creep crack growth in the CT specimens. Results from the FE analyses for both the PM and the cross-weld CT specimens were in good agreement with the corresponding experimental results. The effect of the potential drop versus crack length calibration on the calculated C. values was also investigated. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available