4.7 Article

Parameterization of a rate-dependent model of shock-induced plasticity for copper, nickel, and aluminum

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
Volume 32-33, Issue -, Pages 134-154

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.11.002

Keywords

(A) Shock waves; (B) Constitutive behavior; (B) Metallic material; (B) Elastic-viscoplastic material; (A) Dislocations

Funding

  1. AFRL
  2. NDSEG
  3. NSF CMMI [0758265]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  6. Directorate For Engineering [758265] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A mechanistic model of shock-wave-induced viscoplasticity is parameterized for three polycrystalline metals: Cu, Ni, and Al. The model is also extended to higher stress wave amplitudes by incorporating homogeneous dislocation nucleation within the constitutive framework. Steady shock waves are simulated to demonstrate the model and compare results to experimental data. Stress wave amplitudes of up to 30 GPa have been simulated in each metal; these stress waves generate strain rates of up to similar to 10(10) s(-1) in the shock front. Model results compare favorably with experimental velocity profiles, dynamic stress-strain curves, the Swegle-Grady scaling law, and non-invasive measurements of shear strength in the shocked state. Furthermore, simulated stress-strain-rate profiles exhibit points of self-intersection (loops) because the mobile and immobile dislocation densities have been assigned as internal state variables. Such loops, which have been observed in experiments, are not captured by flow functions that are based on a single monotonically-increasing internal state variable. Finally, the model of 6061-T6 Al alloy is revisited to ammend a prior conclusion regarding shear strength in the shocked state and the onset of homogeneous dislocation nucleation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available