4.8 Article

Temperature-Related Reaction Norms of Gene Expression: Regulatory Architecture and Functional Implications

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages 2393-2402

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msv120

Keywords

transcriptome; expression plasticity; mRNA-seq; reaction norm; gene expression regulation

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Funds [FWF P22834]
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P22834] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 22834] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The environment has profound effects on the expression of many traits and reaction norms describe the expression dynamics of a trait across a broad range of environmental conditions. Here, we analyze gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster across four different developmental temperatures (13-29 degrees C). Gene expression is highly plastic with 83.3% of the genes being differentially expressed. We distinguished three components of plasticity: 1) Dynamics of gene expression intensity (sum of change), 2) direction of change, and 3) curvature of the reaction norm (linear vs. quadratic). Studying their regulatory architecture we found that all three plasticity components were most strongly affected by the number of different transcription factors (TFs) binding to the target gene. More TFs were found in genes with less expression changes across temperatures. Although the effect of microRNAs was weaker, we consistently noted a trend in the opposite direction. The most plastic genes were regulated by fewer TFs and more microRNAs than less plastic genes. Different patterns of plasticity were also reflected by their functional characterization based on gene ontology. Our results suggest that reaction norms provide an important key to understand the functional requirements of natural populations exposed to variable environmental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available