4.7 Review

Ellipticity loss analysis for tangent moduli deduced from a large strain elastic-plastic self-consistent model

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 205-238

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.02.006

Keywords

Scale transition; Ductility; Rice's criterion; Ellipticity Limit Diagram; Plastic instability

Funding

  1. ArcelorMittal Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to investigate the impact of microstructures and deformation mechanisms on the ductility of materials, the criterion first proposed by Rice is applied to clastic-plastic tangent moduli derived from it large strain micromechanical model combined with it self-consistent scale-transition technique. This approach takes into account several microstructural aspects for polycrystalline aggregates: initial and induced textures, dislocation densities as well as softening mechanisms such that the behavior during complex loading paths can be accurately described. In order to significantly reduce the Computing time, it new method drawn from viscoplastic formulations is introduced so that the slip system activity can be efficiently determined. The different aspects of the single crystal hardening (self and latent hardening, dislocation storage and annihilation, mean free path, etc.) are taken into account both by the introduction of dislocation densities per slip system as internal variables and the corresponding evolution equations. Comparisons are made with experimental results for single and dual-phase steels involving linear and complex loading paths. Rice's criterion is then coupled and applied to this constitutive model in order to determine the ellipticity loss of the polycrystalline tangent modulus. This criterion, which does not need any additional fitting parameter, is used to build Ellipticity Limit Diagrams (ELDs). (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available