4.4 Article

CONGRUENT CLIMATE-RELATED GENECOLOGICAL RESPONSES FROM MOLECULAR MARKERS AND QUANTITATIVE TRAITS FOR WESTERN WHITE PINE (PINUS MONTICOLA)

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES
Volume 170, Issue 9, Pages 1120-1131

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/605870

Keywords

adaptive traits; AFLP; divergent selection; ecological genetics; genome scan

Categories

Funding

  1. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analyses of molecular and quantitative genetic data demonstrate the existence of congruent climate-related patterns in western white pine (Pinus monticola). Two independent studies allowed comparisons of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers with quantitative variation in adaptive traits. Principal component analyses were conducted on seedling traits in common gardens collected from 58 sites; principal coordinate analyses were conducted on AFLP data from 15 sites. Collection site eigenvector means were regressed on 35 climate variables to produce a genecological prediction for each data set. Both predictions explained a large percentage (>70%) of the genetic variation from the first eigenvector from similar predictors involving the interaction growing season precipitation and temperature. Both predictions were significant (P < 0: 01), and projected genecological maps were largely congruent. The predominant pattern from the first eigenvector was two major groups, a northern and a southern, connected by a steep cline across the crest of the southern Cascade Range of Oregon. This cline was associated with growth potential in the adaptive traits. These results suggest that divergent climatic selection has influenced phenotypic traits associated with growth. Furthermore, the congruence of AFLPs suggests a linkage between some loci and genomic regions under selection and/or climatic influences on postmating reproductive success.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available