4.7 Article

Quantifying the release of lactose from polymer matrix tablets with an amperometric biosensor utilizing cellobiose dehydrogenase

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 468, Issue 1-2, Pages 121-132

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.03.060

Keywords

Controlled release; Polymer matrix; Biosensors; Cellobiose dehydrogenease; Lactose release; Release mechanisms

Funding

  1. Research School in Pharmaceutical Sciences (FLAK)
  2. European Commission [Chebana FP7-PEOPLE-2010-ITN-264772]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The release of lactose (hydrophilic) from polymer tablets made with hydrophobically modified poly (acrylic acid) (HMPAA) have been studied and compared to the release of ibuprofen, a hydrophobic active substance. Lactose is one of the most used excipients for tablets, but lactose release has not been widely studied. One reason could be a lack of good analytical tools. A novel biosensor with cellobiose dehydrogenase (CDH) was used to detect the lactose release, which has a polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (PDADMAC) layer that increases the response. A sample treatment using polyethylenimine (PEI) was developed to eliminate possible denaturants. The developed methodology provided a good approach to detect and quantify the released lactose. The release was studied with or without the presence of a model amphiphilic substance, sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), in the release medium. Ibuprofen showed very different release rates in the different media, which was attributed to hydrophobic interactions between the drug, the HMPAA and the SDS in the release medium. The release of hydrophilic lactose, which did not associate to any of the other components, was rapid and showed only minor differences. The new methodology provides a useful tool to further evaluate tablet formulations by a relatively simple set of experiments. (C) 2014 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available