4.7 Article

Optimization of madecassoside liposomes using response surface methodology and evaluation of its stability

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 473, Issue 1-2, Pages 280-285

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.07.010

Keywords

Madecassoside (MA) liposomes; Response surface methodology (RSM); Encapsulation efficiency; Physical stability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polar compounds with large molecular weight have poor membrane permeability, liposomes can promote drugs to penetrate epidermis and remain or release at dermis. Madecassoside (MA) exhibits powerful potency in treatment of skin disorders such as wound healing, scar management, and psoriasis, but it is not easy to penetrate epidermis for its hydrophilic nature. The aim of this work is to get the optimum process conditions and evaluate physicochemical properties and physical stability of MA liposomes. In order to avoid this disadvantage and maintain long term drug storage, MA Liposomes were designed to achieve optimum preparation conditions using response surface methodology (RSM) in our experiment. The process and formulation variables were optimized by achieving maximum drug encapsulation efficiency. The optimum conditions were 0.4424 g of madecassoside, 8.174 of ratio of egg yolk lecithin to cholesterol, 65 s of ultrasonic time. The results of particle size, zeta potential and encapsulation efficiency of madecassoside liposomes were 293 nm, -35.6 mV, and 40.90%, respectively, on the basis of the above optimum conditions. According to the morphology of liposomes and encapsulation efficiency of triplicate experiments conducted at optimum conditions, MA liposomes obtained by this optimized formulation had characters of favorable repeatability and proper particle size. The physical stability tests of MA liposomes indicated that its suitable storage temperature was at 4 degrees C with higher encapsulation efficiency. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available