4.7 Article

Comparative in vitro and in vivo evaluation of lipid based nanocarriers of Huperzine A

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 446, Issue 1-2, Pages 16-23

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.014

Keywords

Huperzine A; Solid lipid nanoparticles; Nanostructured lipid carriers; Transdermal delivery system; Alzheimer's disease; Elevated plus maze

Funding

  1. Government of India
  2. Swiss Government
  3. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [INT/SWISS/P-32/2009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of the present investigation was to explore feasibility of nanocarrier based transdermal delivery of Huperzine A (HupA) for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. For this investigation, microemulsion (ME), solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) were formulated and characterized for physicochemical parameters. The pseudo-ternary phase diagrams for microemulsion region were developed using generally recognized as safe (GRAS) excipients. The SLNs and NLCs were prepared by microemulsion template technique. These nanodispersions were formulated into gels for transdermal application and evaluated for various physicochemical parameters. In vitro permeation profiles in rat skin exhibited zero-order kinetics. HupA loaded ME exhibited superior permeation than NLCs followed by SLNs and cumulative amount permeated after 24 h was found to be 147.68 +/- 9.42 mu g/cm(2), 129.11 +/- 32.76 mu g/cm(2) and 10.74 +/- 0.68 mu g/cm(2), respectively. Furthermore, optimized gels were subjected to primary skin irritation testing over a period of 48 h and were found to be safe for skin application. In vivo efficacy tested in scopolamine induced amnesia model indicated significant improvement in cognitive function in mice group treated with developed nanocarrier based formulations as compared to the control group. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available