4.2 Article

HEAR MAPS a classification for congenital microtia/atresia based on the evaluation of 742 patients

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.07.002

Keywords

Otology; Congenital ear anomalies; Aural atresia; Microtia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Describe anatomical and radiological findings in 742 patients evaluated for congenital aural atresia and microtia by a multidisciplinary team. Develop a new classification method to enhance multidisciplinary communication regarding patients with congenital aural atresia and microtia. Methods: Retrospective chart review with descriptive analysis of findings arising from the evaluation of patients with congenital atresia and microtia between January 2008 and January 2012 at a multidisciplinary tertiary referral center. Results: We developed a classification method based on the acronym HEAR MAPS (Hearing, Ear [microtia], Atresia grade, Remnant earlobe, Mandible development, Asymmetry of soft tissue, Paralysis of the facial nerve and Syndromes). We used this method to evaluate 742 consecutive congenital atresia and microtia patients between 2008 and January of 2012. Grade 3 microtia was the most common external ear malformation (76%). Pre-operative Jahrsdoerfer scale was 9(19%), 8 (39%), 7 (19%), and 6 or less (22%). Twenty three percent of patients had varying degrees of hypoplasia of the mandible. Less than 10% of patients had an identified associated syndrome. Conclusion: Patients with congenital aural atresia and microtia often require the intervention of audiology, otology, plastic surgery, craniofacial surgery and speech and language professionals to achieve optimal functional and esthetic reconstruction. Good communication between these disciplines is essential for coordination of care. We describe our use of a new classification method that efficiently describes the physical and radiologic findings in microtia/atresia patients to improve communication amongst care providers. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available