4.2 Article

Vitamin D and tonsil disease - Preliminary observations

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.11.012

Keywords

Tonsil hypertrophy; Tonsillitis; Vitamin D; Iron; Zinc; Body mass index

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of 25(OH) vitamin D deficiency in children undergoing (adeno)tonsillectomy. Methods: From 1st November 2008 to 20th December 2008,33 children aged from 4 to 16 and resident in Auckland, New Zealand (latitude 36 degrees 52` S) undergoing (adeno)tonsillectomy for difficulty breathing/sleep apnoea and/or recurrent tonsillitis had 25(OH) vitamin D, iron and zinc levels measured. Results: Of the 32 patients who had 25(OH) vitamin D levels measured, 15.6% were vitamin D deficient (25(OH) vitamin D < 50 nmol/L), and 78% had levels, < 75 nmol/L 25(OH) vitamin D level was inversely correlated with Fitzpatrick skin type (Spearman's rho = -0.713, p < 0.01), body mass index (BMI) (Spearman's rho = -0.434, p = 0.013) and tonsil size (Spearman's rho = -0.417, p 0.017). However regression modeling demonstrated that only Fitzpatrick skin type (beta = -0.687, p = 0.001) and BMI (beta = -0.256, p = 0.044) were significant predictors of vitamin D levels (R-2 = 0.572). Conclusions: Seventy-eight percent of Auckland children undergoing (adeno)tonsillectomy had a 25(OH) vitamin D level < 75 nmol/L, a level which is associated with an increased incidence of upper respiratory tract infection. Low 25(OH) vitamin D levels were related to a darker skin, increased BMI and larger assessed tonsil size. The association of larger tonsil size with lower 25(OH) vitamin D status needs further evaluation but offers a potential explanation why black and Hispanic children are more likely than white children to have (adeno)tonsillectomy for snoring or obstructive sleep apnoea. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available