4.5 Review

Lighting Up the Force: Investigating Mechanisms of Mechanotransduction Using Fluorescent Tension Probes

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 15, Pages 2570-2582

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00195-15

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01-GM097399]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship
  3. Camille-Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Award
  4. NSF for the IDBR [1353939]
  5. NSF CAREER [1350829]
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1353939] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ability of cells to sense the physical nature of their surroundings is critical to the survival of multicellular organisms. Cellular response to physical cues from adjacent cells and the extracellular matrix leads to a dynamic cycle in which cells respond by remodeling their local microenvironment, fine-tuning cell stiffness, polarity, and shape. Mechanical regulation is important in cellular development, normal morphogenesis, and wound healing. The mechanisms by which these finely balanced mechanotransduction events occur, however, are not well understood. In large part, this is due to the limited availability of tools to study molecular mechanotransduction events in live cells. Several classes of molecular tension probes have been recently developed which are rapidly transforming the study of mechanotransduction. Molecular tension probes are primarily based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and report on piconewton scale tension events in live cells. In this minireview, we describe the two main classes of tension probes, genetically encoded tension sensors and immobilized tension sensors, and discuss the advantages and limitations of each type. We discuss future opportunities to address major biological questions and outline the challenges facing the next generation of molecular tension probes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available