4.5 Article

Optimising the moisture durability SATS conditioning parameters for universal asphalt mixture application

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 433-450

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2012.655740

Keywords

moisture damage; ageing; durability; asphalt mixtures; stiffness modulus; saturation

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G039100/1, EP/F018045/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/G039100/1, EP/F018045/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The saturation ageing tensile stiffness (SATS) procedure is the first laboratory asphalt mixture durability protocol to combine moisture damage and oxidative ageing during the conditioning of asphalt mixtures prior to mechanical testing. However, the application of the SATS procedure has tended to be predominantly targeted at base materials with relatively 'hard' binders and overall high stiffness modulus requirements and is considered potentially too severe for more standard asphalt mixtures. This research study focused on understanding the effect of changes to the SATS conditioning parameters on the relative moisture damage assessment performance of asphalt mixtures, particularly 'softer' binder, high binder content and, finally, low air void content mixtures. Using four different aggregate types, together with 'hard' 10/20 pen and 'softer' 40/60 pen bitumen, the parameters of pressure, temperature and duration were altered, either one at a time or in combination, to arrive at a suitable combination for testing more commonly used 40/60 pen material. The optimum combination of parameters to allow the SATS procedure to be used for a wide range of typically used asphalt mixtures was found to be 0.5 MPa pressure, 85 degrees C temperature and 24 h duration. The revised SATS durability conditioning protocol was still able to successfully discriminate between 'poor' moisture susceptible aggregate and 'good' material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available